Which of these champs is considered more viable?

[quote=React]Olaf, Warwick, or Pantheon? I just wanna know because I like them all.[/quote]

[quote=Booshido]Broooomaciaaaa[/quote]

[quote=Adonikam]Warwick. When people think of Jungle, they think of Warwick. I also feel that Pantheon has been hit hard by the nerf bat. He's basically Urgot if Urgot had no range.[/quote]

[quote=PFP]Warwick. He can fit into any team comp. Olaf is a strong pick but he is more situational.[/quote]

[quote=Jet]Olaf is the stronger choice out of all of them, but in terms of viability Olaf and Warwick are the same. Don't know how he's "more situational" than warwick - Warwick is just an off-tank DPS and Olaf is a off-tank carry.[/quote]

[quote=B-Wong][quote=Jet] Olaf is the stronger choice out of all of them, but in terms of viability Olaf and Warwick are the same. Don't know how he's "more situational" than warwick - Warwick is just an off-tank DPS and Olaf is a off-tank carry. [/quote] This. Olaf is in general a stronger pick but both are good picks in general, nonetheless. Pantheon just sorta falls off if you can't do well early with him (which to me, is incredibly easy to do but then again I'm pretty bad at this game so take that for what it's worth).[/quote]

[quote=Considereth]Pantheon is worthless now and this is coming from someone who has played the hell out of him. I've played him through countless changes. From the beginning when things were right, to stun + spear pantheon, to nerf stun, to nerf everything xD! To be honest I'll rather I have the longer stun and improve spear than how they change him recently. Just trash! :/ As for who is strongest? Olaf is extremely good when paired against non-mobile champions such as Nasus, Xin, Ashe, etc. However, if they have very mobile champions such as Corki, Kass, etc its extremely hard for Olaf because he will be kited. This is where WW shines. WW can shutdown the mobile champions better because of his set of skills. So the question is rather situational.[/quote]

[quote=Iratesniper]I love playing against ww(I play gangplank alot) Pantheon was better, but is still ok depending on how you play him.[/quote]

[quote=PStyle]Olaf in my opinion He can jungle just as effectively as Warwick. He might not be as well in ganking, but his pushing and fighting is better. He can kill squishies and tanks easily, and can destroy towers quickly. Warwick is like Olaf, just not as good in my opnion. Pantheon, built with all AD, is like a physical nuke. When he does heartseaker, he can normally do more than half of the non-tanks health.[/quote]

[quote=naparu53]Well imo Warwick is the best out of them. If you got him you can check out my guide and give it a try.[/quote]