Some people... Just don't get it.

[quote=Riggsinator]"We got no AD" Kat: "I go AD" "All your abilities do magic damage?" Kat: "No I build hybrid" "Which ability says it does physical damage?" Kat: "I go hybrid. My abilities use AD too." "Doesn't matter, they all do magic damage... doesn't matter if it's from AD or AP, they do magic." Kat: "No, I can use AD" /facepalm[/quote]

[quote=Joobieo#41288]Your right, not everyone is willing to put in the time to learn the aspect of everything like they should.[/quote]

[quote=Dante Rebellion]gunblades onn kata works. Just sayin'[/quote]

[quote=caucheka]he's saying that even though kat benefits from stacking ad all her skills do magic damage.[/quote]

[quote=JunSupport]The problem is, the Katarina didn't know what you meant. You didn't see that and did not explain properly that her skills only do magic damage and not attack damage. From my perspective, you're the one who doesn't get how noobs need more thorough explanations. The noob has less understanding of things then you, so what you take for granted, they haven't the slightest clue about. That's partly their fault, but if you want to help YOU have to explain it to them. Example: Say something like "Yes, you can use AD, but it still does Magic damage when you use the skill. We need skills that do AD damage, Katarina's skills do not do AD damage." Fundamentally different from how you explained it in that, you agree with him/her and slip in the differences afterward. People listen more if you start off with an agreement.[/quote]

[quote=Trojan995][quote=JunSupport] The problem is, the Katarina didn't know what you meant. You didn't see that and did not explain properly that her skills only do magic damage and not [b]physical[/b] damage. From my perspective, you're the one who doesn't get how noobs need more thorough explanations. The noob has less understanding of things then you, so what you take for granted, they haven't the slightest clue about. That's partly their fault, but if you want to help YOU have to explain it to them. Example: Say something like "Yes, you can use AD, but it still does Magic damage when you use the skill. We need skills that do [b]Physical[/b] damage, Katarina's skills do not do [b]physical[/b] damage." Fundamentally different from how you explained it in that, you agree with him/her and slip in the differences afterward. People listen more if you start off with an agreement. [/quote] Fixed.[/quote]

[quote=Riggsinator]Trust me, I kept saying that even if they use AD items, her abilities do Magic Damage. Just like how even if WW is all AD, his ult does Magic Damage. Even beyond that they wouldn't take any advice. They built Frozen Mallet, I suggest Rylais and so on. Just one of those "Square Pegs in Round Hole" type thinker I guess.[/quote]

[quote=SinDelta]Wtf are you talking about his ult doesn't do magic damage lol how do you think he lifesteals from it. It if was doing magic damage it would clearly say ww gains spellvamp[/quote]

[quote=React]Dude, you were wrong in this scenario, you weren't explaining it properly.[/quote]

[quote=FreestyleZer0][quote=React] Dude, you were wrong in this scenario, you weren't explaining it properly. [/quote] Actually he was right in this situation, however he didn't post that he said this aswell untill after the whole conversation had started: [quote]Trust me, I kept saying that even if they use AD items, her abilities do Magic Damage. Just like how even if WW is all AD, his ult does Magic Damage.[/quote] ^_^.[/quote]