I think you're mistaken.
The 2500 and 2600 are pretty much the same cpu, just that 2600 has hyperthreading and overclocks ~5% better than 2500, maybe (5% really is NOTHING though..).
Also; Hyperthreading won't matter in most applications.
The 2500 and 2600 are pretty much the same cpu, just that 2600 has hyperthreading and overclocks ~5% better than 2500, maybe (5% really is NOTHING though..).
Also; Hyperthreading won't matter in most applications.
"I walked up to her big butt and asked her *** butt what." - Lil Wayne, lyrical genius
"I can't decide where I stand on abortion, on one hand it is killing children, on the other it gives women a choice." - ???
"I can't decide where I stand on abortion, on one hand it is killing children, on the other it gives women a choice." - ???
Searz wrote:
I think you're mistaken.
The 2500 and 2600 are pretty much the same cpu, just that 2600 has hyperthreading and overclocks ~5% better than 2500, maybe (5% really is NOTHING though..).
Also; Hyperthreading won't matter in most applications.
I meant compared to laptop i5s.
You need to log in before commenting.
Well, if you're ok with spending 60% more money on 10% better performace then go ahead.
I'm personally not made of gold though, so I'd go for the better price/performance.
You don't have to be made of gold to sell your body.