GrandmasterD wrote:
Actually, people did otherwise the thread wouldn't have had so many pages. Besides, is that of any concern here? Not really. I responded to this thread and Satella asked me a question which I answered appropriately. If Satella wants to bring up this discussion once more because he/she wasn't around at the time of the last discussion, that is fine by me. However, neither you nor MyRepublic can nor should deny Satella's and my right to discuss that topic.
It carried on because you and like one or two other people kept arguing even though everyone else agreed you were wrong. and besides I didn't even mention which side I was on in my original post. I said don't start it again, because it's a stupid argument. And why is it stupid? Because everyone just kept saying the same things over and over and neither side made any ground. There is no reason to even discuss it anymore, if anyone wants to look it over again they can go look it up.
@Shuru: Never said it had to be done here, but MyRepublic spoke in general. I wasn't even planning on doing so, I just stated a remark with regard to this topic. Satella chose to respond to that, happens.
@MyRepublic: That's still your opinion, besides that has nothing to do with the debate itself but with the people participating in it.
@MyRepublic: That's still your opinion, besides that has nothing to do with the debate itself but with the people participating in it.
Satella wrote:
You know what a better change would be? Make it so that instead of
Summoner's Resolve
giving +10 gold on smite, it makes you gain +10 gold per neutral monster slain. This buffs the jungler without giving laners more incentive to take jungle camps.I think 2 gold per monster whie having
Smite would be better. But a nice idea. E>specially for farm junglers.
NicknameMy wrote:
I think 2 gold per monster whie having
Smite would be better. But a nice idea. E>specially for farm junglers.so basically give them a free Twisted Fate passive except it isnt global, i actually think thats an ok idea
Thanks to TheNamelessBard for the signature
DillButt64 wrote:
so basically give them a free Twisted Fate passive except it isnt global, i actually think thats an ok idea
Or lower the CD when you're attacking monsters.
as in basic attacks on monsters lower the cooldown of smite? then were gonna see a lot of AS junglers instead of CC/tanky junglers which would basically put people like Maokai and Naut nowhere in the game, and make Nocturne and Xin a constant pick and ban because of their synergy with AS, if you dont mean basic attacks lower the cooldown of smite then what do you mean if im wrong?
but either way i think the cooldown on smite is low enough
but either way i think the cooldown on smite is low enough
Thanks to TheNamelessBard for the signature
DillButt64 wrote:
as in basic attacks on monsters lower the cooldown of smite? then were gonna see a lot of AS junglers instead of CC/tanky junglers which would basically put people like Maokai and Naut nowhere in the game, and make Nocturne and Xin a constant pick and ban because of their synergy with AS, if you dont mean basic attacks lower the cooldown of smite then what do you mean if im wrong?
but either way i think the cooldown on smite is low enough
I think they mean reduce
Smite's cooldown when you kill a jungle monster, which could be cool but unnecessary xD.NicknameMy wrote:
I think 2 gold per monster whie having
Smite would be better. But a nice idea. E>specially for farm junglers.Actually a very good idea
2 gold per camp is nothing; junglers won't get anywhere close to lane gold with that. Back in the beginning of S3 I tried jungle Gangplank rushing Avarice Blade with a TF on our team, farmed as much as possible, and I still had less gold than the top lane Malphite who missed 30% of his CS.
Malphite who missed 30% of his CS.
You need to log in before commenting.
<Member>